Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
In this Discussion
Top Posters
- Arkady 5356
- miss annie 5139
- andy 4506
- Ali 3397
- krappyrubsnif 3205
- tosscat 2291
- David 2179
- ADGS 1875
- kreuzkav 1732
- Mirandola 1618
Comments
I can see the site needs developing, it's been awful for years. However I'm sorry to say that it doesn't actually inspire confidence that John Jones have left it that way for 20 years already. The existing John Jones building is unimaginative to say the least for an arts focussed organisation. There are probably reasons etc, but it's not impressive as a track record.
5 or 6 cheap shots against one undeserving target in a single paragraph. Well done.
I’ve never liked that orange box not facing the street thing, seemed like a real waste.
I’ve no doubt that John Jones with their developers have good intentions. From experience I am suspicious about developers, all that stuff about how we care, we’re ethical, we're part of the community is really heart felt, but can all go tits up when it comes to the economic realities.
And yes, Vista (blue hoarding building site next to JJ) not a good advert for developers. "Oh the market's bottomed out and we need another builder? Let's just leave the place looking like cr@p for the next year until it picks up and we can turn a profit, we live in Hampstead and don't have to walk past it every day".
I've just realised, Vista are unlikely to be chuffed at the idea that their luxury flats (should they ever happen) will be surrounded by the biggest building site in N4 for the foreseeable. Not a great selling point.
My first reaction is that it looks good, and would radically improve the area. Given how high City North will be this development will represent a mid-point between the surrounding 2-3 story buildings and the centre of FP at City North. Given that it's at the bottom of the hill it shouldn't impact the skyline significantly. And there is a limited amount of space for which high-rise is remotely feasible immediately north of FP, I think fears of 'tower creep' north into SG is probably unfounded. There are plenty of towers that I think should come down (like the one near the junction of Crouch Hill and Mount View) because they are ugly and out of context, but much of the area west and immediately north of the station would benefit from being levelled and redeveloped, and some well-chosen iconic structures would not go amiss.
B
B
@Dorothy, Yes i agree with you completely, our current site is an eyesore. Nasty red brick around a big concrete car park and a wire security fence. It really doesn't reflect what we do at all. However, one thing I must point out is that whilst we're successful in terms of our reputation in the artworld and the types of client we work for, we are not in a financial position to facelift the current site (the recent article about a £3m Damien Hirst job was not correct! we wish it were). Have you ever been INSIDE John Jones? Its much different on the inside and we want our new building to reflect us on the outside too... We've done the best we can with what we have now, but to really make improvements - and ones that will have longevity (currently 2nd generation family business, which will hopefully get to 3rd generation one day!) - we have to turn to developers to help us.
I can't repeat enough how important it is for us to develop something of benefit to the local area. We're still in discussions with Islington, Developer, Architects and whilst we have to be realistic (if we don't build up, there isn't a financial incentive for the developers to work with us so nasty red brick building won't be going anywhere...), we will pay attention to the comments made and hopefully achieve at least 99% approval from local residents ;-)
In the meantime I'll leave you with an art recommendation - we've just framed the show at Whitechapel Gallery Where Three Dreams Cross. Its a survey of photography from Bangladesh, Pakistan and India - works from the past 150 years, many of which have never been seen before. Some amazing stories are told through the images http://www.whitechapelgallery.org/exhibitions/where-three-dreams-cross-150-years-of-photography-from-india-pakistan-and-bangladesh
Have you heard any further rumours about the progress of the neighbouring development facing Stroud Green Rd? If it's stalled indefinitely then we probably ought to start protesting about the hording.
Arky
@Kate: This suggestion probably comes a little late in the process, but why not throw open the task of designing the new building to an architectural competition. That way you give a chance for young and up-and-coming architects to express new and exciting ideas. This may be less common for smaller developments but it is certainly a tried and tested process and would certainly seem more in keeping with your organisation’s philosophy. In this market you'd probably get responses from some proven, high quality outfits too! You'd be far more likely to end up with an inspiring building as a result.
I did go to the open day - many thanks for organising this and giving us a chance to comment. I'm sorry to say that I was a little underwhelmed. While I can see that tricky logistical issues are addressed quite effectively by the proposal, and there is some reflection of the local architecture (bricks, tall slim building segments like the terraces), it is not very exciting or imaginative.
There was a statement in the intro saying that the highest ‘sustainablilty’ standards where being strived for, or something to that effect. I gather that the residential areas are aimed at Code for Sustainable Homes level 4. The requirements for level 4 are a long way short of the highest (level 6). In fact, elements of code 4 are expected to become the legal minimum this year. From the looks of the highly glazed commercial areas, I can’t image these will be high performing either. So, I though the statement was dishonest and there was not much in imagery to suggest a design which responds to the environment effectively enough to be properly low-impact.
All of the perspective views displayed at the open-day were from above, as if the viewer was floating by on a hot air baloon. I would have appreciated some street level views to give a better sense of scale (the elevations go some way but you’d have to hundreds of meters away to get a similar view). Not only is the proposed building about three times the height of the existing, it also extends much closer to the site perimeter. I am not against taller buildings but the proposed design is quite a lump! There would certainly be less imposing ways of achieve a similar volume of sellable/lettable space. Could some of the internal courtyard space be position on the outside for example?
With economical conditions as they are you should be is strong position in terms of choosing developer and architect. You’re the boss! If you are going to stick with your current developer and architect then they may need to be pushed a bit harder if you want something a little more imaginative to come out of this process.
I also thought that many of the drawings failed to show the side profile of the John Jones design in relation to the neighbouring buildings.
Like Richard, above, I feel it would be great to see more of the courtyard/green space on the outside of the build, think it makes a real difference seeing a bit of green, especially there.
I haven't been into John Jones for a while, I admit. I used to go into the shop a lot when you sold art materials. It doesn't seem very inviting. I'll give it a go though.
Good news for the Budget Supermarket though, on the corner of Woodstock Road.
<a href="https://www.islington.gov.uk/onlineplanning/apas/run/WPHAPPDETAIL.DisplayUrl?theApnID=P100197&backURL=<a href=wphappcriteria.display?paSearchKey=387789>Search Criteria</a> > <a href='wphappsearchres.displayResultsURL?ResultID=499476&StartIndex=1&SortOrder=APNID:asc&DispResultsAs=WPHAPPSEARCHRES&BackURL=<a href=wphappcriteria.display?paSearchKey=387789>Search Criteria</a>'>Search Results</a>">Application details</a>
Arky
Residents in Stroud Green (Harringey) have not had much chance to consult, over Islington Council's plans according to <A HREF="http://www.richardwilson.me.uk/2010/02/06/residents-should-have-a-say-on-huge-stroud-green-road-development/" target="+blank">Richard Wilson, a local LibDem Councillor, in his blog</A>.
Was the ex-Scala in really bad condition? Was it worth saving?
Arky
With regard to wider consultation - there's no requirement for anything more than the standard neighbour consultation, i presume islington will be consulting haringey residents given that they are neighbours as well as consulting haringey council itself?
Arky